Which case number describes a scenario where an alternate must be filed despite not needing it, yet it remains on the flight log?

Which case number describes a scenario where an alternate must be filed despite not needing it, yet it remains on the flight log?

• A. Case 3
• B. Case 1
• C. Case 2
• D. No Case

Answer: (A)

In IFR flight planning, you file an alternate airport whenever regulations require it, even if you don’t expect to need it. The reason is to have a legally and operationally ready backup in case conditions at the destination worsen or a favorable approach becomes unavailable. The scenario described in Case three shows this situation: an alternate must be filed despite not needing it, and it remains listed on the flight log as part of the plan. This reflects proper planning and compliance, ensuring you’re prepared for a fallback option and that the flight log accurately represents the intended plan.

In IFR flight planning, you file an alternate airport whenever regulations require it, even if you don’t expect to need it. The reason is to have a legally and operationally ready backup in case conditions at the destination worsen or a favorable approach becomes unavailable. The scenario described in Case three shows this situation: an alternate must be filed despite not needing it, and it remains listed on the flight log as part of the plan. This reflects proper planning and compliance, ensuring you’re prepared for a fallback option and that the flight log accurately represents the intended plan.